Convictions

Would It Be Okay For Me To Be Angry With God?

By Tim Challies

It felt like a test—a test of my faith, a test of my convictions, a test of my love for God. Soon, very soon, after I learned that my son had died, I received a message from an old acquaintance. Her intentions were good—she wanted to offer consolation. But her instructions were suspect—she wanted me to rage against God. Paraphrasing one of her favorite authors she said “It’s okay to be angry with God about this. It’s okay to tell him exactly how you feel about him right now. Let him have it. He doesn’t mind.”

My instincts rebelled against her counsel, but for just a moment I wondered. I didn’t feel anger in my loss, but should I? I didn’t resent God’s sovereignty in taking my son, but might that be appropriate? Already I was leaning hard on God for comfort, but should I now also press against him for blame? In that very moment a verse of scripture, a mere fragment, flashed into my mind. “Curse God and die.” In this case it was not a human demanding it of another as Job’s wife did of her husband. Rather, it was the Holy Spirit’s reminder of what it would mean for me to raise my fist to the sky.

That moment was a test of my faith. Haven’t we all wondered whether our faith would be able to withstand a staggering blow like the sudden, unexplained death of a child? I certainly had. In that moment I had to choose whether my faith would push me toward God or away from him. I had to make a choice between submission and rebellion.

That moment was a test of my convictions. I have often proclaimed the glories of God’s goodness and sovereignty, yet this has been easy because they’ve so constantly been aligned with my own desires. In that moment I had to choose whether I would continue to proclaim in the dark what I had celebrated in the light, or whether, instead, I would allow my circumstances to overturn my beliefs. I had to choose whether these doctrines would draw me to God in comfort or alienate me in anger.

That moment was a test of my love. I have so often proclaimed my love for God, but now he had taken my child, my firstborn, my son, my protégé, the man in all the world who was most precious to me. In that moment I had to choose whether I would love God through this or rage against him, whether it would turn my affections ever-more toward him, or whether it would steer them away.

That moment was a test, I’m sure of it. For though there is a thread of teaching in the Christian world that says it is a sign of maturity and authenticity to be angry with God, I am unconvinced. In fact, I’m sure the opposite is true—that there would never be an appropriate time for me to be angry with God or at God. Why? Because, ultimately, to be angry at what God does is to be angry at who God is. To be angry with his actions is to be angry with his person. It’s to doubt that his actions were just, that they were wise, that they were right, that they were good. It’s to cast aspersions on his very character.

That’s not to say we can never be angry. It’s not to say we must be completely impassive in the face of grief, sorrow, and suffering. On this note John Piper helpfully distinguishes between anger at a thing and anger at a person: “Anger at a thing does not contain indignation at a choice or an act. We simply don’t like the effect of the thing: the broken clutch, or the grain of sand that just blew in our eye, or rain on our picnic. But when we get angry at a person, we are displeased with a choice they made and an act they performed. Anger at a person always implies strong disapproval. If you are angry at me, you think I have done something I should not have done.”

And who am I to be angry at what God has done? Who am I to disapprove of what he has permitted? Who am I to conclude God has done something he should not have, or to even suggest the notion? I might be angry at what I do, or what you do, or what John Piper does, but all of us are sinful, all of us are foolish, all of us are wrongheaded, all of us make mistakes, all of us sometimes bring harm even when we attempt to do good. We might very well have done something we ought not to have done. But not God. He only ever does what is right and what is good. He only ever permits what is best. He is so for us that no action he takes would ever ultimately be against us.

Little wonder, then, that, after Job’s wife encouraged her husband to curse God and die, he gently corrected her. He warned her that in her grief (for she, too, had suffered terrible loss) she was speaking words that were suitable only for the mouth of a fool. Then he asked rhetorically, faithfully, wonderfully, “Shall we receive good from God, and shall we not receive evil?” Then follows this affirmation of his tremendous faith: “In all this Job did not sin with his lips.”

Comfort comes not from anger at the divine will, but acquiescence to it.

Job knew that consolation does not come by raging against God, but by submitting to him. Comfort comes not from anger at the divine will, but acquiescence to it. J.R. Miller says it sweetly: “[God] has a right to take from us what he will, for all our joys and treasures belong to Him and are only lent to us for a time. It was in love that He gave them to us; it is in love that He takes them away. When we cease our struggle, and in faith and confidence submit our will to His, peace flows into our heart and we are comforted.” Comfort comes when we align our will with the will of God. Peace flows when we bless him in our grief as we did in our joys. For his love is as constant, his character is as perfect, his actions are as irreproachable in the taking as they were in the giving.

Posted at: https://www.challies.com/articles/would-it-be-okay-for-me-to-be-angry-with-god/

On Building Convictions and Wearing Masks

By: Andy Farmer

This time last year, I could have imagined I might write a blog on building Christian convictions. But I could not imagine it would have been about wearing masks. Yet here we are facing contention in our communities, families, and churches on the issue of wearing masks during the current pandemic. I have had my share of conversations with folks who believe masks are essential to saving lives in a pandemic. Others are equally convinced that masks are at best an unfounded government overreach and possibly part of a larger plan to abridge personal freedoms. I’ve been sent mountains of information and study data (from both positions) that have, frankly, left me more bewildered than anything else.

Often the issue of personal convictions comes up in the current conversations about wearing masks. As in, “I have a personal conviction that I should not go anywhere if I can’t be sure people are wearing masks.” Or, “I have a personal conviction against wearing masks unless there are legitimate health issues at stake.” I can certainly respect people operating out of conviction. But it has raised questions for me.

  • What is a personal conviction?

  • When do I need one?

  • How do I get one if I need it?

  • How do I build a conviction in response to a particular circumstance?

Without diverting into a philosophical rumination, let me briefly answer the first three questions because they’re generically related. Personal convictions are beliefs that are held strongly enough by an individual that they are committed to having their lives governed by them. They are committed to being known for them, and to varying degrees, are willing to act on them even at personal cost. A conviction isn’t a preference or a tendency. It is something clearly believed and strongly held in an ongoing way.

Essential Convictions and Personal Convictions

As Christians, we must have certain convictions borne out of our belief in Jesus Christ as Savior of the World. These convictions are best derived from the great creeds of the Church and the Statements of Faith to which we ascribe in our churches and denominations. Orthodox Christianity is well attested. We can have great confidence in our faith convictions when we ascribe to the primary historic doctrines related to the nature of God, the state of humanity in creation and fallenness, the authority and sufficiency of Scripture, and the person and work of Christ.

Personal convictions are of a different sort. They are not creeds or fixed rules or laws that define our standing with God. Nevertheless, they are an important part of the Christian faith. Christians draw the idea of personal convictions from the command language of the Bible, in particular the “grace commands” of the New Testament. Knowing that Jesus Christ has fulfilled the law on my behalf, I am now free to live for Christ in joyful obedience to His commands. That is how I love Him (John 14:15).

We talk about the “indicatives and imperatives” pattern in the New Testament letters. The apostle Paul, in particular, structures his letters to churches with a strong doctrinal basis for confidence in our salvation (the indicatives) and follows that up with “if this is true, therefore here is how you should live”—the implications of life in Christ expressed in command language (the imperatives). The forming mechanism for Christian personal convictions is our application of the New Testament imperatives to life situations based on our indicative position in Christ.

Convictions overlap with wisdom and Christian freedom of conscience. We should be able to show from the Bible where we develop our convictions. But just because we derive convictions for ourselves from Scripture doesn’t mean we can impose them on others. In many cases, Christians may come to different personal convictions because of the biblical principles they are applying and how they weigh out various applicable biblical texts. In any case, the rule of faith should keep us from elevating our convictions to universal moral law. And the rule of love should keep us from imposing our convictions self-righteously on others.

Not all convictions are created equal. We often have to develop convictions in response to what life brings our way. I had no convictions on wearing masks prior to 2020. I hope at some point in the not-too-distant future, I’ll be able to retire this conviction, or at least only have to apply it in limited circumstances. But I’ve recognized the need for a conviction on masks so that my behavior is not being shaped by cultural pressure or personal feelings. I need a conviction on masks so I can approach mask-situations with a clear head, a humble heart, and a focus on serving others, not defending or protecting myself.

Building a Conviction

This gets us to the fourth question. How do I build a circumstantial conviction? Here are some guiding principles I’ve tried to apply to my mask conviction, and really what I want to apply to anything I hold as a personal conviction.

  • Seek to understand the circumstances in a balanced way, as much as possible. We want thoughtfully considered convictions, not knee-jerk reactions we need to defend. Defensiveness can be used to cover the fact that we haven’t considered an issue in its complexity and depth. If I’ve considered an issue thoroughly, I should be confident but not defensive if someone disagrees with me.

  • Consider the whole counsel of God. Don’t cherry-pick verses out of context to support what you think. Wrestling with the Bible is essential in developing personal convictions. In the example of masks, I have been strongly influenced by Romans 14, relating to how the strong must consider the weak. But I can’t build from this alone. After all, who says I’m the strong one in this issue? Maybe time will prove that others were more right than me, and in fact, I was the weak one who needed bearing with.

  • Commit to humility and charity in the way you articulate and apply your conviction. The fact that we need personal convictions in the first place assumes there isn’t universal clarity on an issue. In 1 Corinthians 13, Paul counsels us that we can be entirely right on a given issue but utterly wrong on what God values.

  • Build out from principle to practice. A practice without a principle is a rule. A principle without a practice is a theory. I need to apply my personal conviction on masks without other people having to accommodate me. In fact, graciously held personal convictions will position me to interact with others in a posture of servanthood, not personal rights.

  • Keep convictions proportional. Something may be very important to me, but not to someone else. We don’t need to fight over masks. We live in a time where the fewer needless arguments we have (in person or on social media), the better off we will be.

So what is my personal conviction on masks? That’s another conversation entirely. My question is, what is your conviction? And how have you gotten there?

Question for Reflection

  1. What passages of Scripture have shaped your personal conviction on mask-wearing during the COVID-19 pandemic?

  2. Are you humbly and charitably applying and articulating your conviction, or is being right more important to you than loving your neighbor?

Posted at: https://www.biblicalcounselingcoalition.org/2020/12/07/on-building-convictions-and-wearing-masks/